Adequacy of traditional curette versus powered shaver for adenoid clearance: a comparative study

Background: Adenoid growth is a prevalent aetiology of blockage nasal passage in paediatric patients, and multiple techniques exist for their surgical removal. The objective this investigation was to study the efficacy conventional curette versus endoscopic guided powered shaver context adenoid clearance. Methods: In study, comparative analysis performed on sample 119 consisting two distinct groups. Group I-60 patients who underwent adenoidectomy, while group II-59 microdebrider-assisted adenoidectomy. methods employed were accordance with established medical practises. research evaluated outcome measures including duration, haemorrhage, perioperative postoperative adverse events. Results: I, 17 (28.3%) received adenoidectomy as standalone procedure, II, 22 (37.3%) procedure. An adenotonsillectomy executed 21 accounting 35% 10 16.9% II. found that I exhibited significantly reduced operation time blood loss compared II (20.88±4.41 vs. 29.00±4.15 minutes 13.47±3.02 18.64±3.16 millilitres, respectively). Intraoperative complications observed 10% 5.1% participants more rapid onset symptomatic relief those I. There no evidence recurrence cohort Conclusions: Endoscopic superior dependable technique curettage, exhibiting improved clearance rates patient contentment.